Thursday, November 5, 2015

Vivaladraught - at it again - a tale of two built environment systems





A Tale of two built environments in the South Africa domestic architectural landscape.
by Vivaladraught
The South African built environment landscape has 2 very clear systems that operate completely separately from each other. This does have a much broader impact socially and culturally, however that is a much more complex subject. This small essay is to try focus on the domestic built environment here in SA. To desperately try and create some perspective and dialogue to allow some much needed level headed reasoning & change to prevail.
The tale of these two built environments needs to be told as a matter of urgency.  Because each has positives that can be gained from each other. Sadly and frustratingly the rate things are now going, each of these 2 built environment systems is doing its level best to completely ignore the other and grow in completely separate directions. To the complete detriment of everyone living in them. Alarmingly at no point in the future do these 2 built environment entities ever look like they will ever converge or align, And this is very worrying.
Without complicating this discussion, we need to separate public building works and the industrialized built environment. In this discussion its only the domestic built environments that need to be carefully looked at. And the process of plans regulation and planning submissions. The domestic built environment is a multi billion Rand industry and needs to be working smoothly for job creation and a sustainable economy. Jobs are being held up by bureaucratic government run planning systems that are fanatically over regulating the building plans submission and approval process. Not allowing plans approval for building work to be easily accomplished.
the two built environments are
1)   The formal domestic built environment , which is completely over regulated by council bureaucratic red tape fanatics, who at municipal level find every reason why plans should not be approved. Its becoming completely ludicrous that the built environment planning system is holding up simple building jobs for well over a year or more. This is now costing the public billions in inflation costs and wasted time. To add to the complete frustration these municipal  fanatics constantly fiddle with zoning scheme regulations, change plans submission procedures and change submission forms. Not to mention their new computer submission systems going off line for days on end and also wiping submission flash drives completely clean of all information when submitting. forcing the professionals to now rescan everything once again. (at a huge personal cost of course) The knock on effect of this insanity is that the architectural professional is left looking less than professional in front of a totally irate client. This over regulation and constant changing of regulation procedures and complete disregard for architectural professionals, public and builders waiting to build, is now completely out of control.

2)   Informal built environment, in this system the rules and regulations are no where near as restrictive. Building plans are not needed for building work within these communities. Privately run street committees decide on all matters within these communities and building work is happening faster than the available land can keep up. Municipalities dont regulate these communities with the same vice like grip as they display in the formal sector. I would be surprised if a building inspector is able to control the full impact of the informal domestic work going up at alarming rates. It appears that the municipalities here in cape town, inspect, regulate and monitor the first system fervently, whilst giving the second informal built environment a complete wave through of the hand to do anything it pleases. This approach doesnt care at all that millions of people now live very unsafely in communities that completely burn down regularly. Are built so badly that TB and other issues spread in unventilated tin shacks. Duevto the unregulated living environment millions are compromised, thousands of people die. Surely an equal medium should desperately trying to be reached between the two. 

     Another huge issue is that informal settlements are not regulated. Which means a south african can own multiple properties in multiple informal settlements, renting out to foreigners at premium rates. These communities give huge sums of finance to the street committees. Its my understanding that very minimal rates and taxes or finance goes back into the system to help support roads and infrastructure in the community. Its really the formal sector that pays for all of that. Some people are making huge profit in this area. However thats all in the private sector not controlled by councils.

Both systems have merit however the informal settlement is hurting the people by being regulerised by private enterprise. Private enterprise does not care about safe living conditions. It only cares about money, while people literally die. All added and abetted by regulation loopholes allowed by on high officiating.
As professionals one is having to rewrite the entire national building regulation document on the plans. In the formal built environment, If ones plans clearly have notes like, all building work to be in accordance with the relevant national building regulations and performed by qualified and registered contractors to meet with local authority regulations. And a structural engineer will be appointed by the owner of the property to check and approve structural integrity of design. etc etc. surely one doesn’t now still have to put every single note that is in the national building regs onto ones plans. Their are plans examiners in cape town who spend days writing essays of notes that are found in the national building regs, for professionals now to painstakingly add national building regulation notes to documents, which takes a long time. surely linking ones plans to this massive document is enough, surely making sure the owner knows that he needs to appoint suitably qualified contractors and a structural engineer will take care of the detail. Once plans have been passed zoning and scrutiny fees are paid, surely it should be an easy enough approval stamp.
So we have 1 system that is completely over regulated on a first world level and getting much worse and another built system that completely is allowed to go forward unregulated. Surely we can find a system that works down the middle somewhere so both can converge.
Hopefully the council for the built environment can start solving this massive issue which is bringing an entire industry to its knees. crippling job creation and holding up the economy. The SA  economy needs work to be created – it cannot be created if the very building plans are being held up for years due to petty tin soldier type mindedness.
What incentives are there for an informal settlement dweller to become upwardly mobile. So they are able to live in the formal sector? At the moment a huge amount of people will never bridge the great chasm of formal informal divide.
A solution and a more equal way forward needs to be found asap – or we will simply all sink further in a red tape kwagmire of apathy.
yours sincerely
Vivaladraught. activist extraordinaire