Sunday, July 19, 2026

To "Think" is human, to "Thunk" is AI. Not at all the same process!





Currently there are now 2 very different streams of intelligence and thought processes when it comes to creativity on earth.


(1) Human biological engineering "Thinking." A real human "THINKS." A "Thinking" cognitive outcome is from a human biological mind.


(2) Artificial intelligence "Thunking!" An AI "THUNKS!" This is an algorythmic data harvested instant retrievel intelligence process. 

The 2 different processes are simply not the same or equal in measure. This is the big con of big tech creativity that threatens to shut biological creative human thought down completely. Relegating it to second place. 

AI is sold as a super intelligence which  supercedes human biological mind cognitive creative thought. To name a process is very important to what people understand as the outcome & how we view what intelligence really can be. The naming was incorrect to my mind as AI. Its an Artificial process, Calculative Data Assimilation? When comparing biological human thinking to AI's process. We have imaginative "Thinking" & data harvisted retrieval "Thunking". To "Thunk" is after the human biological "Think" has already been completed. And the huge library of human driven creative data is now available for retrieval and unashamedly harvisted, copied & regurgitated by AI.! 

To "Think" is a biological human endeavor, to "thunk" is an AI data retrieval process. AI is a data harvisted retrievel system "thunk" shows all the human biological creative information "Thinking" has already been done by us biological real creative engineers over thousands of years. And AI is now stitching a million cognitive human creative thoughts together in calculator speed. I admire a calculator for doing what i cant do in the same time. Complex calculations in mere seconds. I dont believe a calculator is a sentient intelligence. I understand its a very helpful tool to help me calculate.  AI is the same  type of tool for me. It enhances the imagination , it doesn't replace my imaginative ability. I will still work on improving my own minds eye creative conceptualization ability. And  my artistic designs through rough sketches. 

At present & completely unbeknown or even noticed by many of my biological human colleagues. Artificial Intelligence is rapidly painting human creative imaginative endeavor all the same colour. There is a difference between enhancing our imaginative designs. & completely giving over our creative ability imagination. I will always put AI second, i will retain my own imagination even while using AI as a useful tool. The huge danger to my mind is those without any artistic imagination & skills or any creative ability or no design ideas now all put AI first. A plethora of copy con artists all "Thunking" together. Data harvisting all the already done over thousands of years real creative "Thinking" as their very own artistic creative work.  Siesman.

So in the near future when all biological engineers or real human artistic expressive individuality is painted the same dull colour by AI "Thunking". When individual creative artistic  human thought and imagination is outlawed by the drone temple AI pilots council of all human creative endeavor. And all biological human real thought engineers imaginative efforts are  superceded by Artificial Intelligence "Thunking!" A few biological synaptic human brain engineers will still have the ability to be artistically, creatively imaginative without the "thunk". Simply just keep pushing your individual art, designs and creativity in the face of all this artificial "Thunking" process.

Im not against AI enhancing my renders, im not against AI as a very powerful tool helping with my graphic ideas. Im all for individual creative endeavor. What i feel is phoney, is those who have no singing voice, no musical talent, no practiced musical ability at all, using AI to sell the idea they are wonderfully musically talented and gifted. When AI using "Thunking" has done 99% of the propping up of the persons projected by AI musical ability.  I find that all very fake and fraudulent and some people have no shame doing it. Its like paying someone to write a book for you and slapping your name all over it. Or getting someone else to write the bar exam for you, Siesman!